Table of Contents
ADJECTIVE ORDER: BẢNG THỨ TỰ TÍNH TỪ
นอกจากการดูบทความนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถดูข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์อื่นๆ อีกมากมายที่เราให้ไว้ที่นี่: ดูเพิ่มเติม
ADJECTIVE ORDER: BẢNG THỨ TỰ TÍNH TỪ
Tại sao là long black hair mà không phải black long?
Tại sao là a big old tree mà không là old big?
Adjective Order in English – English Grammar Lesson
Learn about adjective order in English with this lesson. When you use several adjectives with a noun in English, the adjectives have to go in a specific order. For example, we say \”strong black Italian coffee,\” but you can’t say \”strong Italian black coffee\” or \”Italian black strong coffee.\” Why not? Because of the adjective order rules. Learn more about adjectives and improve your grammar with online English lessons: http://bit.ly/ooeteachers.
You can see the full lesson (which includes the text and a quiz to help you practice) here: http://www.oxfordonlineenglish.com/adjectiveorderinenglish
Contents:
Rule 1: Opinions go first and facts go second 1:57
Rule 2: General ideas go before specific ideas 3:30
The full rule: 5:21
The basic rules for adjective order are:
Opinions go before facts
General ideas go before specific ideas
There’s also a more complicated rule, which you’ll see in the video.
You can learn more about these adjective order rules and how to use them in the video lesson.
SUBSCRIBE to continue improving your English! https://goo.gl/UUQW8j
Become an OOE member to see our newest lessons before they’re available to the public, and more! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNbeSPp8RYKmHUliYBUDizg/join
See more of our free English lessons on this page: http://www.oxfordonlineenglish.com/freeenglishlessons
Adjective order | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Learn about the adjective order of Standard American English and your new favorite memory aid: DOSASCOMP.
Practice this yourself on Khan Academy right now: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/grammar/partsofspeech/themodifier/e/adjectiveorder?utm_source=YT\u0026utm_medium=Desc\u0026utm_campaign=grammar
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/grammar/partsofspeech/themodifier/v/introtothecomparativeandthesuperlativev2?utm_source=YT\u0026utm_medium=Desc\u0026utm_campaign=grammar
Missed the previous lesson? https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/grammar/partsofspeech/themodifier/v/introtoadverbs?utm_source=YT\u0026utm_medium=Desc\u0026utm_campaign=grammar
Grammar on Khan Academy: Grammar is the collection of rules and conventions that make languages go. This section is about Standard American English, but there’s something here for everyone.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using stateoftheart, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We’ve also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Grammar channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8JT97hQjMVWeO0Bx8eVxQ?sub_confirmation=1
Subscribe to Khan Academy: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=khanacademy\”
Unit 19 Adjectives and Adjective order Tính từ và trật tự của tính từ
Gender Neutral Pronouns: They’re Here, Get Used To Them
There are important corrections to this video. Visit here: https://www.tomscott.com/genderneutralpronouns/ or pull down the description to read them. Original description: Grammatical gender is a silly concept. So I’m about to go against my vow of descriptivism, and risk being run over by the Linguistic Mafia’s bus, and say this: it’s a silly idea.
CORRECTIONS
March 9th, 2019
Back in 2013, I made a video about ‘singular they’ and genderneutral pronouns. Looking back on it with half a decade of hindsight, there are several things I want to correct. I also have a few thoughts on how the reactions to it have changed over time, and why the video’s comments will remain off.
Firstly, while editing the video, I cut the first sentence of the script. That sentence didn’t seem to add anything, and I’m a believer in ‘don’t bore us, get to the chorus’. That would have been fine — if only the script didn’t refer back to that first sentence later on, noting that the viewer probably didn’t notice the singular they in it.
There used to be an annotation explaining that mistake, but YouTube’s deleted all annotations now. I regret the error.
Secondly, I mentioned that recentlycoined genderneutral prounouns (hir, xe, etc) haven’t caught on in regular usage, and that trying to deliberately add new words into a language is extremely difficult. I think that’s true, but my tone was a bit too dismissive — there was an implied value judgment there. I’d rephrase that in a second video.
And finally, I coopted a couple of LGBT slogans, both in the title of the video and the video itself. Those aren’t my slogans to rewrite, and adding ‘with apologies to’ in the reference line isn’t a great way of solving that. Looking back, I’m uncomfortable with those.
Changing times
In 2013, the video was uncontroversial. You can see that in this chart of likes and dislikes over time from YouTube’s analytics tool:
[graph available on https://www.tomscott.com/genderneutralpronouns/ ]
The video received very few dislikes until 2016. And I remember the comments from back then: those dislikes weren’t from angry conservative types. Instead, those were speakers of languages that used grammatical gender — they were angry that I’d insulted their language!
But you can see the tide start to shift in 2016. This is why I turned off comments: it seems that a small number of people with limited empathy deliberately search out videos about subjects like this just so they can hit ‘dislike’, leave awful comments that are usually one of a few toxic injokes, and go. YouTube’s moderation tools remain desperately inadequate at dealing with that problem without appointing fulltime moderators, and frankly, that would be time and money that could be better spent on almost anything else. For that reason, the comments are going to remain off.
If I were to remake this video in 2019, the most significant change would be focus: the title would be all about singular they, not genderneutral pronouns. It probably wouldn’t even mention LGBT issues beyond a quick reference. It wouldn’t be a shout of hey, did you know about these folks, because five years later, most people watching the video do. Instead, it’d be a quiet nod of I see you.
What worked for a 2013 audience doesn’t work in 2019.
It seems that, over the last few years, nonbinary and trans folks have reached stage three on the Williams Scale: ‘then they fight you’. Hopefully, it won’t take long to reach stage four: ‘then you win’.
นอกจากการดูหัวข้อนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถเข้าถึงบทวิจารณ์ดีๆ อื่นๆ อีกมากมายได้ที่นี่: ดูวิธีอื่นๆLEARN FOREIGN LANGUAGE